How States Are Using the Turning Point Model State Public Health Act

Identifieur interne : 005854 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 005853; suivant : 005855

---

How States Are Using the Turning Point Model State Public Health Act

Auteurs : M. Jane Brady [États-Unis] ; Keith Kutler [États-Unis] ; James G. Hodge [États-Unis]

Source :

• The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics [ 1073-1105 ] ; 2004-12.

RBID : ISTEX:923BEC2AECB995070F1329046430DBB69A305865

English descriptors

• Teeft :
  • Abortion services, Active tuberculosis, Actual application, Address core services, Administrative regulation, Administrative rules, Administrative searches, Anecdotal experiences, Appropriate action, Balances community, Best practices, Better alternatives, Biannual state legislature, Broad mechanisms, Broad participation, Broader awareness, Careful consideration, Careful specificity, Catholic church, Central question, Civil rights, Collaborative state exercise, Communal health threats, Complementary consideration, Comprehensive effort, Comprehensive model, Concurrent sessions, Conscious decisions, Considerable attention, Constitutional norms, Core areas need reform, Court cases, Criminal enforcement, Crisis situation, Critical functions, Critical scrutiny, Current laws, Different states, Easy road, Effective reform, Emergency responders, Emergency response, Emergency situations, Enforcement personnel, Environmental issues, Epidemiological investigation, Everyday basis, Features disease, Further action, Global travel options, Government intrusion, Government officials, Grant higginson, Habeas corpus, Health condition, Health crises, Health crisis, Health departments, Health framework, Health laws need, Health models, Health powers, Health system, Healthy people, Hospital associations, Hrning point, Human services, Individual choices, Individual interests, Infectious organisms, Information privacy, James hodge, Jane brady, Judicial environment, Justice recommendations, Keith kutler, Language issues, Laws need, Legal authority, Legal elements, Legal framework, Legal principles, Legal provisions, Legal purposes, Legal questions, Legal response, Legal structures, Legislative compromises, Legislative items, Legislative year, Lhrning point, Licensing boards, Limited resources, Lkrning point model state, Local government officials, Mandatory prescription, Many business, Many perspectives, Many roles, Many states, Measures government, Medical employees, Medicine ethics, Mission statement, Model acts, Model state, Multiple challengeslegal, Multiple levels, National organhatiom, Natural response, Next session, Ordinary citizens, Oregon experience, Oregon health policy, Oregon state, Oregon supreme, Other cultures, Other hand, Other health conditions, Other members, Other policies, Other resources, Other states, Outbreak, Particular challenge, Partner notification, Personal concerns, Planning responses, Point model, Point model state, Policy developers, Political climate, Political plausibility, Political realities, Potential benefits, Practical implications, Private property, Professional associations, Public health, Public health concerns, Public health consultant, Public health infrastructure, Public health issue, Public health issues, Public health laws, Public health legislation, Public health outbreak, Public health partner, Public health practice, Public health services, Public health system, Public health workforce, Review process, Robert wood johnson foundation, Safety issues, Same time, Scientific standards, Several areas, Several decades, Short circuit, Similar outbreak, Skills state, Solid relationships, Special supplement, State attorneys, State authorities, State department, State governments, State health officer, State level, Streets someone, Strong relevance, Structural features, Substance abuse, Support autonomy, Support west nile mosquitoes, Temperature sensors, Track conditions, Travel restrictions, Unintended consequences, Vacation travelers, Voluntary treatment.

Url:

• https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-ZB9698X3-H/fulltext.pdf

DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2004.tb00200.x

Affiliations:

• États-Unis
• Delaware, Maryland, Oregon

---

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

• to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 001B04
• to stream Istex, to step Curation: 001B04
• to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 001F33
• to stream Main, to step Merge: 005D00
• to stream Main, to step Curation: 005854

---

Le document en format XML

---

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SrasV1/Data/Main/Exploration

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005854 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 005854 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Sante
   |area=    SrasV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:923BEC2AECB995070F1329046430DBB69A305865
   |texte=   How States Are Using the Turning Point Model State Public Health Act
}}

---

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. Data generation: Tue Apr 28 14:49:16 2020. Site generation: Sat Mar 27 22:06:49 2021